Skip to content

Amuse Bouche redux

After my last visit to Amuse Bouche, I commented on how Damir referred to the chef’s tasting menu as the "Fear Factor" menu, and how the time before, we had to stop at the pub on the way home for him to have more to eat, so this time I decided to go with two women who both love to cook rather than one hungry man who is quite happy with the burger and beer special.

It was my friend Pat’s birthday, and my sister Betty and I treated her to dinner at Amuse Bouche, which neither of them had visited before. We quickly decided on the 7-course chef’s tasting menu, and asked for complementary wines to accompany each course.

First, we were served an amuse bouche (not one of the 7 courses) of a smoked white chocolate and lobster bisque-like mouthful, charmingly presented in an espresso cup. Creamy and sweet, a great start on a cold winter night.

The first of four appetizers was horse carpaccio (that’s thinly-sliced raw horsemeat for those of you unfamiliar with the fine points of eating Black Beauty), topped with dots of sheep and cows milk cheese and truffle oil. Once I moved past the psychological barrier of eating horse — which I was surprised to find lurking in my psyche — it was delicious: the meat is very dark red, like game, very lean yet quite mild in flavour.

Appetizer #2 was smoked trout chopped into tiny cubes, and served with equal-sized cubes of tomato and croutons. At one end of the plate was a peeled cherry tomato; at the other was a similar-sized ball of what turned out to be deep-fried mayonnaise in crust — quite delicious, and an interesting contrast to the other flavours and textures on the plate.

Third was fois gras, which I predicted as soon as the waiter brought us the wines, a muscat with a wonderful blend of acidity and sweetness. There was a cube of pear gelee on the plate, a nice complement to the fois gras, and a third food that I can’t even recall, I was so blown away by the perfect crispy finish on the fois gras that remained pink inside. Actually, I think the third one was crispy onions of some sort, but seriously, the fois gras just dominated that course for me.

Fourth was a square of haddock and one perfect little clam; I could have eaten a bowl of those clams without blinking.

We had a pause before the main course, and a palate cleanser of a tiny ball of passion fruit ice, sweet and tart in just the right balance.

The main was lamb, a loin cut I believe, roasted rare and served on an eggplant puree. It was accompanied by a prune stuffed with chopped hazelnuts and Cabrales (a Spanish blue cheese), something that I will definitely be attempting to replicate at home as hors d’oeuvres. Also with it was a tiny perfect white turnip, about the size of a small radish. The perfect amount of meat after four appetizers (and knowing that we still had a cheese course and dessert to go), although I could have used a touch more veg on the plate.

The cheese course was a savory panna cotta, and although I don’t know what cheese was used in it, it was delicious: served in a small funnel shaped glass, I turned my spoon around and used the small handle to dig the last bits of it out of the bottom (which I felt was infinitely classier than using my finger).

Lastly was dessert, the only course where the three of us were served different selections: a rum and raisin creme brulee, a chocolate marizipan mousse with espresso ice cream, and a passion fruit and meringue tart. All three were delicious.

I remember none of the wines by name except the Cave Springs "Dolomite" Riesling that we were served with the second appetizer, but I do recall that they were a good match for each course. I just checked their wine list online, and none of the wines look familiar, including the Cave Spring which I know that we had, so it might not be completely up to date. They have a nice selection from a number of countries, with a good representation from Canada including some from Thirty Bench, a great little winery in the Niagara region that sends me cases of wine on subscription.

My overall recommendation: this remains a great "special occasion" restaurant, and I highly recommend the chef’s tasting menu with the matching wines. The service is very good but not at all intrusive, although we had trouble hearing one of the waiters when he described the dish that he brought to our table and had to ask him to repeat it. We spent over 3 hours at dinner, and never felt either rushed or like we were waiting around, although I’m glad that we were about to start our main course when a party of 10 — which fills half the restaurant — showed up, since I’m sure that their orders swamped the kitchen after that. By then, however, we were on to the cheese and dessert, both of which require minimal preparation.

Vintages release for February 2nd

I’m a bit late for this, but the wine only gets better with aging, right? Especially considering the focus of the release, which in honour of the 30th anniversary of Robert Parker’s 100-point wine scoring system, included a great selection of wines with a score of 90+.

I receive the winecurrent.com reviews of the Vintages releases and highly recommend subscribing, even in the face of my slight rant yesterday about preferring blog posts over email newsletters; their type of review of the current Vintage release does lend itself nicely to an email format. I haven’t tried any of these 90+ wines yet, but there’s a few that I want to check out in the under-$20 range (which is my "buy a bunch and keep around for casual drinking" price point):

  • Stella Bella Semillon/Sauvignon Blanc 2006, Margaret River, Australia. $18.85, LCBO #48546.
  • Pillar Box Red 2005, Padthaway, South Australia. $17.40, LCBO #685941
  • Lieu-Dit ‘Les Poyeux’ Saumur Champigny 2005, AOC Saumur Champigny. $16.85, LCBO #52639
  • Armand Riesling Kabinett 2005, QmP Pfalz. $16.85, LCBO #60905
  • Cyan 12 Meses 2003, DO Toro. $16.75, LCBO #66936

There are many others in the $20-30 range, and several well above that. Definitely worth checking out both the wines, and winecurrent.com’s newsletter, that always arrives a day or two in advance of the Vintages release.

Ontario Wine Review newsletter

I used to blog about wine and wine events over on the AWS blog, but when I resigned from the AWS board in order to spend more quality time going to conferences ;) I decided to cut back to two blogs as well. However, I get a lot of wine and food news and enjoy blogging about it, so will resurrect that part of it here.

Today, the most recent copy of Michael Pinkus’ Ontario Wine Review newsletter arrived. You can read it online here or download a PDF version here. I have to say, I’m really turned off by the permission email newsletter model by now. Blogging is so easy, and there is really nothing to be gained by having my email address on your mailing list; I’d much rather receive this and other newsletters purely through my RSS reader, not through emails piling up in my "to read" folder. He seems to have five (!!) specialized blogs and a podcast, but when I click on any of the syndicate options on the main newsletter site, I only see the message "Error creating feed file, please check write permissions". Grrrr.

In any case, this week’s newsletter has a review of Cave Spring Cellars, which I’ve never visited although I’ve driven through Jordan many times on the way to the rest of the Niagara wineries. Pinkus liked their "Dolomite" Riesling and their "La Penna" Cab Franc/Cab Sauv blend, the latter of which is only available at the winery since they only made 200 cases. Sound worth checking out.

Periodic Table Printmaking Project

Ninety-six printmakers created a total of 118 representations of the elements of the periodic table using various printmaking techniques: woodcuts, etching, lithography, etc. I’m a big fan of print art and own about 25 pieces, most of them from the artists who belong to Open Studio.

There are a number of really incredible prints in the periodic table project, but I’d love to add this one by Annie Bissett to my collection:

ChlorineFinal

Blogging course

There’s an online course on blogging that’s available for free if you blog about it (which might seem counter-intuitive). Anyway, you have to give it a plug in order to get free access, which is what this post is about.

I’m evaluating a multi-media course on blogging from the folks at Simpleology. For a while, they’re letting you snag it for free if you post about it on your blog.

It covers:

  • The best blogging techniques.
  • How to get traffic to your blog.
  • How to turn your blog into money.

I’ll let you know what I think once I’ve had a chance to check it out. Meanwhile, go grab yours while it’s still free.

Chillin’ with Olivia

Last Sunday brought an enormous, city-closing snowstorm to Toronto, and our condo holiday party — good attendance because no one wanted to leave the building. Given that many of us are NDP supporters, we also had a visit from Olivia Chow, our MP, who bundled up in her boots and parka to walk the 1.5km over in the snow. Jack, apparently, was at the airport trying to get a flight to Halifax.

We had a chat about the draconian copyright bill that was supposed to be introduced in Ottawa last week, but wasn’t; she’s completely on board with why the bill is a bad thing. It likely helped that I helped her out with a little Blackberry problem that she was having just then. :) The best part, however, was her Rona Ambrose imitation.

Latest email scam to watch for

I had seen a warning about this earlier today, but wouldn’t have fallen for it after even the briefest review:

secure-your-credit-card scam email

First of all, all the links (including the one to Microsoft and all the credit card companies) link to the same scammy web address, which you can see in the final "For security your Credit Card information" line. Ingeniously, someone actually registered the domain name with which to scam the public into giving away their credit card information. You have to give them credit for that, although their nameservers are Yahoo, so it was only a matter of time before someone woke up over there and cut them off — the site is already down.

Secondly, the scam artist claims to be from Microsoft, yet gives a non-Microsoft email address and website. Yeah, right.

Thirdly, the grammatical errors are beyond laughable:

  • "the up mentioned Credit Card companies"
  • "The securing of your Credit Card will not take longer than 3 minutes, and can spare you of loosing your hard earned money"
  • "Microsoft has sent this email in conformity with the law protected email program rules"

The email header included the following:

Return-Path: support@secure-your-credit-card.com

Received: from stonefive.com ([69.27.20.174]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 5si706804nzk.2007.12.18.17.17.02; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:17:03 -0800 (PST)

Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 69.27.20.174 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of support@secure-your-credit-card.com) client-ip=69.27.20.174;

Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 69.27.20.174 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of support@secure-your-credit-card.com) smtp.mail=support@secure-your-credit-card.com

Received: from ts1.albblaw.local ([69.54.73.162]) by stonefive.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:35:45 -0700

From: "Microsoft" <support@secure-your-credit-card.com>

I’m not sure if that means that the stonefive.com SMTP server or the IP address 69.27.20.174 were hijacked for this purpose.

Zipcar freebies

Join Zipcar and get $25 in free driving!I wrote a post back in October talking about Zipcar’s referral program, and included a badge (reproduced here) that would give anyone signing up through it $25 in driving credit, plus $25 in driving credit to me. Amazingly, someone clicked, and I received an email today saying that I have $25 in driving credit from a web referral! To whomever clicked, thanks for that, and have fun with your Zipcar membership.

PM Hell

Every once in a while, I run up against a project manager on a client project who seems to be there just to make my life hell. Usually I just let this roll off me since it’s only a temporary condition — that’s part of why I work as an independent, after all — but sometimes I just have to rant.

To begin with, I usually work on the design side of things, from functional requirements through technical design, and I leave the project management to the trained professionals: not only do I not like doing project management, I’m not very good at it. I think that many companies do a great disservice by "promoting" technical people to project managers by allowing that to be the only pathway for their advancement, rather than creating senior technical positions with the same prestige and pay. What happens in the current model, since so many developers have moved into project management roles, is that the term "project manager" has come to mean someone who also does some amount of the business requirements or design work on a project as well as managing it.

This is just plain wrong.

First of all, if someone is tasked with managing the project, let them manage the project without burdening them with other roles that might be in conflict with their primary role. Second, if someone has been in project management for a while, their technical skills are probably a bit rusty, and you could end up with poor results. Furthermore, many people in project management don’t even have a technical background, but are expected to take on technical project work because of the assumption that they used to be a developer; this is almost always not going to work out well.

The worst case that I experienced was when an ex-COBOL programmer was assigned by his large management consulting employer as a project manager on an implementation project, but he was obviously frustrated by that position and wanting to do technical design. I was the lead architect on the job, but he argued with pretty much every point in the design, even though he had no understanding of the technical development environment, and little understanding of the specific products that we were using (products on which I was very experienced). We spent a lot of time arguing over things, only to end up back where I started in the first place. Since I was a subcontractor to his company, he lobbied to have my contract terminated (which was within their rights, with the appropriate amount of notice) and I breathed a sigh of relief over not having to deal with him any more, as well as not having to go to a very cold part of the country in February. The end result: the architecture and design were redone by the project manager with some input from a couple of the developers who weren’t familiar with the BPMS; the system was installed more than a year late, went way over budget, and didn’t meet the customer requirements. After turfing out the big consulting firm, the customer called me back to see if I could help fix the mess. I laughed all the way to a different customer in a warmer climate.

A more recent PM from hell wanted to completely control my access to the customer. As an independent contractor rather than permanent staff, she may have felt threatened by my existence, and obviously felt she could do my job just as well as I could — without any apparent skills or experience at it. Since I often work offsite and she worked onsite, she was able to convince the customer to funnel every piece of email and documentation that I needed through her, rather than just having the customer copy her on communications to me. There were obviously a lot of conversations (via email) going on that I was not privy to, and which would have made my job easier, but the PM decided to filter the information that went to me. At one point, she even said that she was doing this in order to "watch my back" for me (presumably so that she knew exactly where to stick the knife). At one point I needed a detailed database schema, and the PM replied that what she had was too detailed for me; I suggested that I could make that decision, and to just send it on, but instead, she had someone in the internal IT group run a not-detailed-enough report for me. When I asked for more information, the PM said "This is what we decided was best to send to you." Every interaction that I had with this PM was the same frustrating, teeth-pulling exercise. Although I did a good job for the customer, it could have been better if I’d had wider access to people and information.

I have a huge amount of respect for skilled project managers, but let’s get a few things straight:

  1. I don’t want your job, so don’t feel threatened. I like my job just fine, or I wouldn’t be on the project in the first place.
  2. I don’t care if you want my job, the customer hired me to do it, not you. Do your own damned job.
  3. Don’t create barriers between me and the sources of information that I need in order to do my job, or you will negatively impact the end product and the customer satisfaction.

Searching for the perfect desktop search solution

Until recently, I’ve used the free version of X1 for desktop search. Although it can be very resource-intensive during indexing, I love how it indexes Outlook email across multiple PST files, and allows very flexible searching.

Last week, I installed a network-attached drive for our shared home office, and that reminded me that the free version of X1 didn’t support indexing of files on network drives. Before I decided to bite the bullet and pay for the full professional version, I decided to give Google Desktop Search — which I tried a few months back — another try. It has improved from my first trial, and I like how fast and complete it is at indexing files, but I’m really not happy with the search interface for email.

X1 by default shows all of my email in a single stream, sorted on date (forward or reverse), then allows me to dynamically filter the stream based on any combination of content, to/from, subject, folder (I use folders extensively for email organization within Outlook) and date. Google (once you find the advanced search options page) searches email by content, date and to/from — but doesn’t allow partial match searches on the actual email address in the to/from, which is pretty useless for me when I’m looking for all email from a particular customer, for example. Once a search is executed in Google, there’s no filtering, just the results list; you have to return to the advanced search screen to start a more precise search. Inexplicably, the Google search functionality that’s added into Outlook as a toolbar only allows content searching, no to/from or date searching, and returns the results without reference to where they are in terms of PST file or folder structure.

I also use X1 when I’m reorganizing email, for example, to find all of the messages from a particular customer that are in the Sent Items folder and move them to the specific customer folder. Not only can I find them all quickly, the X1 interface allows me to grab them all directly and move them to the new location; although Outlook has to be open while this is happening, I do the move through X1’s interface, not through Outlook. I can also do many other common Outlook functions directly on messages in the X1 interface, including reply, forward, delete, etc.

At the root of my issue is the completely opposite philosophies adopted by X1 and Google: X1 starts by showing you everything that you have, then allows you to filter the results; Google starts by showing you nothing, then allows you to search for what you want. The Google approach works well on the internet, where the content is essentially infinite and I’m only interested in a tiny subset of it; however, X1 may make more sense for the files that I have on my desktop (and network drive), since I have interest in the complete set of information, and am primarily looking to narrow it down to the few items that I’m interested in at any particular moment.

So today, I’ve reinstalled X1 for indexing only my email, and have left Google Desktop Search for indexing my files while I continue to evaluate Google’s usability as a file search tool. I do like that Google includes things like recent web pages in the search results, so I may end up with this hybrid solution, although I don’t like the idea of using two different utilities for basically the same operation.